This week is the shareholder structure reform of four company flow shareholders vote time period. There are many on the market on this analysis, it was said that "the pilot Corporation stock price rise, directly affect the stock's real interests, voting in favour of a more favourable. "" Programme is rejected, the inevitable crash after the stock market opened. "
For the above, investors should look at how to understand, and make a reasonable choice? reporter interviewed the famous market satellite. In his view, the existence of misleading investors, the need for timely clarification. Programmes by not necessarily rise
Satellite view, adopted "programme, the stock is not necessarily rise!" has drawn this judgment the reasons are many, already do not have to be carefully addressed the financial accounts, financial accounts method on the Internet very much. He mentioned one instance is electric wide media (information market Forum) "unit of insolvency". He said, we can recall "shares to repay" then shareholders as well as programme designers is how to say what is good, will give flow described programme shares the benefits to shareholders. Now everyone can see the stock before and after the implementation of programmes and then pulls out of those commitments and the statements of good to make a comparison. From the current four programmes, these programmes if you pass, you will soon be able to verify that "even though the programme adopted, stocks do not always go up!" this judgement.
Programme-but not necessarily fell
Satellite said, "the scheme does not adopt, the circulation of shares does not necessarily fall!" the cause of the judgment obtained. Scheme does not adopt was to maintain the status quo, what reason must fall? address the equity division reform has a famous saying "making no back arrow", is just the Government's management of rhetoric? Chinese stock market shares will be resolved, not to mention a single of a public company? do shareholders are going to believe this scheme was not successful, the company no longer proposed new programme? no longer addressing equity issues? anyway I do not believe! "is not making a return arrow", in any case have to do in the future, perhaps later proposed conditions to better is feasible. Scheme does not adopt it or "right", containing programme adopted is not a "right-bearing unit."
Circulation shareholders have no access to affordable
Satellite expressed the hope that the companies are to give you a share buy back programme implementation of the company's stock.
He said that the payment of the so-called on non-trading stock prices are negotiable, please give a purchase of shares of stock of reason! buy the stock after the implementation of the programme is to be compensated? have a compensation! why the price of buying? to speculate (or small circulation spare)? 12 months there will be more and more non-negotiable shares into circulation, who can guarantee that during the year to speculative success? buy now or later for three years and then buy? to investment value? year merit poor performance in three years, three years after all-what is negotiable, what price situation? who can tell you, who can guarantee or sponsor?
He said that these so-called "take stock" scenario, suppose you have a vote, after the resumption of, access to the benefits of trading stock shareholders want to sell a stock, who's gonna buy? these results is the market automatically right, although non-circulation of shareholders the payment of the consideration, but shares shareholders don't get the actual benefits. The three "sent stocks" programme, essentially in programme implementation before comparison, induced shareholders vote in favour, in programme implementation lead investors rushed to sell shares of the programme, is a "bear market" thinking the seller under the guidance of the programme, is a "down stairs" solution. A long term interests of many investors will be subject to greater damage, and at that time no one please.
No comments:
Post a Comment